ArticleScientific data2025
X-ray Coronary Angiogram images and SYNTAX score to develop Machine-Learning algorithms for CHD Diagnosis.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- VMamba-QAG-net: a five-stage pipeline for SYNTAX score computation and decision support in interventional cardiology using X-ray angiography.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Reperfusion injury in STEMI: a double-edged sword.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is becoming a leading cause of death worldwide. To assess coronary artery narrowing or stenosis, doctors use coronary angiography, which is considered the gold-standard method. Interventional cardiologists rely on angiography to decide on the best course of treatment for CHD, such as revascularization with bypass surgery, coronary stents, or medication. However, angiography has some issues, including operator bias, inter-observer variability, and poor reproducibility. The automated interpretation of coronary angiography is yet to be developed, and these tasks can only be performed by highly specialized physicians. Developing automated angiogram interpretation and coronary artery stenosis estimation using Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches requires a large dataset of X-ray angiography images that include clinical information. We have collected 231 X-ray images of heart vessels, along with the necessary angiographic variables, including the SYNTAX score, to support the advancement of research on CHD-related machine learning and data mining algorithms. We hope that this dataset will ultimately contribute to advances in clinical diagnosis of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.