Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40118950›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sensitivity analysis of reliability constrained, eco optimal solar, wind, hydrogen storage based islanded power system.

Nishant Thakkar, Priyanka Paliwal, Deepa Kaliyaperumal, V Ravikumar Pandi, Narayan Prasad Gupta, Marco Merlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nishant ThakkarCenter for Renewable Energy and Microgrid, Huanjiang Laboratory, Zhejiang University, Zhuji, 311800, Zhejiang, China.
Priyanka PaliwalDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Deepa KaliyaperumalDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bengaluru, 560035, India. k_deepa@blr.amrita.edu.
V Ravikumar PandiDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kollam, India.
Narayan Prasad GuptaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, UIT RGPV, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Marco MerloEnergy Department, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global energy expansion strategy has incorporated islanded renewable energy-based power generation systems to electrify remote communities. The development of these renewable energy systems (RES) decreases grid dependency and operational costs. Solar photovoltaic power stations (SPPS) and wind-driven power stations (WDPS) are commonly employed technologies in isolated power systems. However, their intermittent nature poses dependability obstacles. Therefore, the incorporation of storage technology is essential to enhance reliability. This paper presents a sensitivity analysis to determine the optimal, reliable, and cost-effective sizing of a SPPS, WDPS, and hydrogen storage systems (HSS) based power system for case study of Jaisalmer, India. The ideal dimensions of each component are determined in two different cases, each having a unique objective function. The optimal sizing is attained through a metaheuristic optimization method called Butterfly-PSO. Reliability assessment is carried out using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and two key reliability indices, namely ENS and LOLE are taken under analysis. Sensitivity analyses are performed to examine the effects of incorporating or excluding RES and storage elements on system reliability and cost-efficiency. The findings presents that increasing SPPS capacity by one unit changes around LOLE by 13%, ENS by 14%, and LCOE/TLCC by 1%. Varying WDPS capacity changes LOLE by 16%, ENS by 19%, TLCC by 3.3%, and LCOE by 1.4%. Adjusting HSS tank size by one unit affects LOLE by 2%, ENS by 2.6%, and TLCC/LCOE by 0.02%. Case 1 (Min TLCC) offers a more reliable and cost-effective solution than Case 2.

Indexed as

Butterfly-PSOHydrogen storage systemMonte Carlo simulationReliability assessmentRenewable energy systems

Identifiers

PMID40118950
PMCPMC11928496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.