ArticleScientific reports2025
Absolute quantification of rare gene targets in limited samples using crude lysate and ddPCR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of an RT-Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Detection of Peste des Petits Ruminants.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Duplex digital PCR assay on microfluidic chamber arrays for total HIV DNA reservoir quantification in persons with HIV.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Two distinct subpopulations of human stem-like memory T cells exhibit complementary roles in self-renewal and clonal longevity.PLoS biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate quantification of rare genes from limited clinical samples is crucial for research purposes but is technically challenging, especially due to nucleic acid extraction. Using the commercially available genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction kits, which mostly include a DNA purification step through silica columns, magnetic beads or ethanol precipitation, are the preferred choice for many researchers. These kits, however, have a minimum cell number requirement for optimal DNA quality and yield. They are not ideal for use for clinical samples with limited cell numbers. Here, we report the development and validation of a novel crude lysate method for preparing DNA for the absolute quantification of rare genes, TRECs in our case, by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), from infrequent cells, that removes the need for DNA extraction. Multiple optimization steps and analytical validation of this novel assay was performed on PBMCs extracted from the blood of healthy donors. The newly developed assay shows good agreement with standard ddPCR and has high accuracy, specificity, and reproducibility; additionally, it can also be applied to fixed and permeabilized cells. The assay has the potential to be used for quantification of other trace targets from limited cell samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.