Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40118911›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A general simulation-based study on printability of inks in direct ink writing.

Md Asaduzzaman Sourov, Seyda Islam Emu, Md Shajedul Hoque Thakur, Maruf Md Ikram, A K M M Morshed, Muhammad M Rahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Additive Manufacturing of High-Performance Polymers for Extreme Environments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Computational approaches in bioprinting processes.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Asaduzzaman SourovDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Seyda Islam EmuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Md Shajedul Hoque ThakurDepartment of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.
Maruf Md IkramDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
A K M M MorshedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh. monjur_morshed@me.buet.ac.bd.
Muhammad M RahmanDepartment of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. maksud@rice.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct ink writing (DIW)-based 3D printing process has gained significant attention due to its ability to accommodate versatile ink materials. However, the most challenging aspect of DIW is the development of inks with suitable printability. To address this, we demonstrate a numerical approach using the finite element method (FEM) to model the printability of inks. Five distinct ink models, including cement, thermoset polymer (epoxy), biopolymer (cellulose nanocrystals), and two hydrogel inks (alginate-based biopolymer and metallic powder), have been chosen to identify the key differentiating characteristics between inks with high and low printability. We focus on the shear thinning behavior, shape retention, and ink blockage region as key factors to evaluate printability and propose a printability grading parameter that demonstrates the qualitative ranking of inks based on their rheology. The study reveals that inks with better printability exhibit greater shear thinning behavior, yield shear strength, shape retention, and viscosity at a suitable inlet pressure. Among all the inks studied, we have found a specific concentration of cellulose nanocrystals (20 wt%) that demonstrates the best printability.

Indexed as

3D printingDirect ink writingFinite element simulationNozzleRheology

Identifiers

PMID40118911
PMCPMC11928492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.