ArticleScientific reports2025
Metabarcoding identifies macroalgal composition as a driver of benthic invertebrate assemblages in restored habitats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large brown macroalgal forests support diverse communities of associated invertebrates. However, human activities have led to their degradation, replacing the original macroalgal assemblages with less-complex habitats and altering the associated invertebrate communities. To counteract this, restoration actions are currently being performed aiming at their recovery. Here, we used metabarcoding of the COI gene to describe the invertebrate community of a 10-year restored macroalgal forest dominated by Gongolaria barbata. This invertebrate assemblage was compared with an assemblage adjacent to the restoration site where G. barbata is absent, and two healthy assemblages also dominated by G. barbata, used as references. Results showed that arthropods, molluscs, and annelids were the most abundant groups. Specific MOTUs representing sponge and ascidian species were exclusively found in G. barbata assemblages, suggesting that the restoration particularly benefited some of these organisms. Crustaceans and molluscs, however, were similarly abundant across assemblages, including the one dominated by photophilous macroalgae (without G. barbata), thus indicating that these mobile groups may equally colonise these alternative habitats. The overall composition of the restored assemblage did not completely resemble references, suggesting that recovering all associated diversity is a complex process, most likely influenced by multiple factors that require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.