Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40118902›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Banana Leaves Imagery Dataset.

Neema Mduma, Christian Elinisa

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neema MdumaNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania. neema.mduma@nm-aist.ac.tz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-3124
Christian ElinisaNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we present a dataset of banana leaf imagery, both with and without diseases. The dataset consists of 11,767 images, categorized as follows: 3,339 healthy images, 3,496 images of leaves affected by Black Sigatoka and 4,932 images of leaves affected by Fusarium Wilt Race 1. This data was collected to support machine learning diagnostics for disease detection. The data collection process involved farmers, researchers, agricultural experts and plant pathologists from the northern and southern highland regions of Tanzania. To ensure unbiased representation, farms were randomly selected from the Rungwe, Mbeya, Arumeru, and Arusha districts, based on the presence of banana crops and the targeted diseases. The dataset offers a comprehensive collection of images captured from November 2022 to January 2023, using a high-resolution smartphone camera across a wide geographical area. Researchers and developers can use this dataset to build machine learning solutions that automatically detect diseases in images, potentially enabling agricultural stakeholders, including farmers, to diagnose Fusarium Wilt Race 1 and Black Sigatoka early and take timely action.

Indexed as

MusaPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesFusariumMachine LearningTanzania

Identifiers

PMID40118902
PMCPMC11928457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.