ArticleScientific reports2025
Data collaboration for causal inference from limited medical testing and medication data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating covariate-balanced survival curve in distributed data environment using data collaboration quasi-experiment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Anomaly detection in double-entry bookkeeping data by federated learning system with non-model sharing approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Observational studies enable causal inferences when randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible. However, integrating sensitive medical data across multiple institutions introduces significant privacy challenges. The data collaboration quasi-experiment (DC-QE) framework addresses these concerns by sharing "intermediate representations"-dimensionality-reduced data derived from raw data-instead of the raw data. Although DC-QE can estimate treatment effects, its application to medical data remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to apply the DC-QE framework to medical data from a single institution to simulate distributed data environments under independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID conditions. We propose a method for generating intermediate representations within the DC-QE framework. Experimental results show that DC-QE consistently outperformed individual analyses across various accuracy metrics, closely approximating the performance of centralized analysis. The proposed method further improved performance, particularly under non-IID conditions. These outcomes highlight the potential of the DC-QE framework as a robust approach for privacy-preserving causal inferences in healthcare. Broader adoption of this framework and increased use of intermediate representations could grant researchers access to larger, more diverse datasets while safeguarding patient confidentiality. This approach may ultimately aid in identifying previously unrecognized causal relationships, support drug repurposing efforts, and enhance therapeutic interventions for rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.