Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40118896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring PM

Waad Abuouelezz, Nazar Ali, Zeyar Aung, Ahmed Altunaiji, Shaik Basheeruddin Shah, Derek Gliddon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Waad AbuouelezzDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Nazar AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE. nazar.ali@ku.ac.ae.
Zeyar AungDepartment of Computer Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Ahmed AltunaijiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Shaik Basheeruddin ShahDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Derek GliddonEnvironmental Science Development, Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Funding

Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research N. A.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particulate Matters PM[Formula: see text] and PM[Formula: see text] present a major health and environmental concern in urban regions. This research compares machine learning and time series models, such as Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Facebook Prophet, for predictions of these matters. Their performances have been evaluated over 1-2 hours, 1 day and 1 week forecasting periods using five years real-life data from six ground stations in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Performance metrics including Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Percent Bias (PBIAS) were applied. Linear SVR was generally the best performing model for PM[Formula: see text] predictions at all stations with averages of 18.7% and 28.2% MAPE for 1 and 2-hour periods, respectively. However, CNN performed best in forecasting PM[Formula: see text] for 1-hour horizon, with an average MAPE of 12.6%. For the 2-hour forecast, SVR outperformed other models, with 18.3% MAPE. Facebook Prophet consistently outperformed others for both PM[Formula: see text] and PM[Formula: see text] with 21.8% and 13.4% MAPE for 1-day and 21.3% and 13.8% MAPE for 1-week, respectively. These best performing models yielded similar RMSE, MAE, and PBIAS values for both PM[Formula: see text] and PM[Formula: see text].

Indexed as

Air pollutionConvolutional neural networkDecision treeFacebook ProphetLong short-term memoryMachine learningPM10PM2.5Random forestSupport vector regression

Identifiers

PMID40118896
PMCPMC11928502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.