ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive evaluation of sugar beet varieties based on genotype × yield × trait (GYT) in different environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes using genotype by trait (GT) and genotype by yield × trait (GYT) methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Adaptability and Stability of Proso Millet Grain Yield: A Multi-Environment Evaluation Using AMMI, GGE, and GYT Biplots.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the agronomic traits and genotype by yield × trait (GYT) interactions of sugar beet across seven ecological pilot areas in Northeast and North China using GYT biplot analysis. Utilizing correlation analysis and implementing the AMMI model, GGE biplot, and GYT biplot, the study analyzed the agronomic characteristics including plant height, leaf length, leaf width, leaf stalk diameter, SPAD value, root rot, brown spot, sugar content, and sugar yield of 16 sugar beet varieties in the 2023 regional experiment across seven planting ecological pilot areas. The pairwise correlation between yield and trait combinations was analyzed using the GYT biplot technique. Principal components PC1 and PC2 accounted for 80.19 and 12.31% of genotype-trait interactions. KWS7748 (G1) exhibited broader adaptability and superior yield compared to other varieties across different planting areas. Among the varieties tested in the regional sugar beet experiment, KWS7748 (G1) demonstrated the best comprehensive performance. Simultaneously, in the multi-character evaluation methods of sugar beet varieties, the results of GYT biplot analysis and evaluation proved to be more reliable than those of GGE and GT biplot, indicating its effectiveness as a scientific evaluation method for sugar beet varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.