Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40118848›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Climate influence on the early human occupation of South America during the late Pleistocene.

L Becerra-Valdivia

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L Becerra-ValdiviaDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. lorena.becerra-valdivia@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-5347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The settlement of South America marks one of the final steps in human expansion. This study examines the impact of climate change on this process, focusing on two millennial-scale climatic phases-the Antarctic Cold Reversal and Younger Dryas. Using Bayesian chronological modelling, a cultural timeline was constructed from approximately 150 archaeological sites and 1700 dates, and compared against paleoclimatic records. Findings suggested that human activity likely began in regions most affected by the Antarctic Cold Reversal, specifically in southernmost and high-altitude areas. Together with estimates indicating that the onset of megafaunal exploitation and bifacial point technology occurred before or during the Antarctic Cold Reversal, results suggested that cold conditions did not likely hinder human settlement. Key factors likely included accumulated cultural adaptation and relatively milder climatic changes in the Southern Hemisphere. More widespread occupation likely occurred during or, more likely, after the Younger Dryas as conditions stabilised. Results highlighted the western Andes as a crucial dispersal route and questioned the role of humans and climatic shifts on megafaunal extinctions. An analysis of the compiled archaeo-chronometric dataset revealed significant underrepresentation and reporting gaps, highlighting the need for expanded research and rigorous documentation to improve the reliability of the cultural timeline.

Indexed as

ClimateClimate ChangeHuman ActivitiesHuman MigrationAntarctic RegionsArchaeologyBayes TheoremHistory, AncientHumansSouth America

Identifiers

PMID40118848
PMCPMC11928665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.