ArticleNature communications2025
Leveraging pleiotropic clustering to address high proportion correlated horizontal pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation does not equal causation: the imperative of causal inference in machine learning models for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Shared genetic architecture and neurobiological pathways of problematic alcohol use and anxiety disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Revisiting the association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and sleep: Moving from correlation to causation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mendelian randomization harnesses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes. However, certain genetic variants can affect both the exposure and the outcome through a shared factor. This phenomenon, called correlated horizontal pleiotropy, may result in false-positive causal findings. Here, we propose a Pleiotropic Clustering framework for Mendelian randomization, PCMR. PCMR detects correlated horizontal pleiotropy and extends the zero modal pleiotropy assumption to enhance causal inference in trait pairs with correlated horizontal pleiotropic variants. Simulations show that PCMR can effectively detect correlated horizontal pleiotropy and avoid false positives in the presence of correlated horizontal pleiotropic variants, even when they constitute a high proportion of the variants connecting both traits (e.g., 30-40%). In datasets consisting of 48 exposure-common disease pairs, PCMR detects horizontal correlated pleiotropy in 7 out of the exposure-common disease pairs, and avoids detecting false positive causal links. Additionally, PCMR can facilitate the integration of biological information to exclude correlated horizontal pleiotropic variants, enhancing causal inference. We apply PCMR to study causal relationships between three common psychiatric disorders as examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.