ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
Allo-HCT refined ELN 2022 risk classification: validation of the Adverse-Plus risk group in AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation within the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (GETH-TC).
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of molecular profiling in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic transplantation in first remission: a study by the PETHEMA group.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Treatment-specific prognostic performance of ELN 2022, ELN 2024, and Beat AML 2024: a real-world AML validation study.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Genetic risk classification in acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation and post-transplant cyclophosphamide.Haematologica · 2026Article
- The oncogenic role of ecotropic viral integration site 1 in hematological malignancies: mechanisms of activation and leukemogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Pandora's Box of AML: HowBiomedicines · 2025Review
- Emerging strategies and novel therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia: current advances and future directions.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multicenter retrospective study by GETH-TC validates the prognostic value of the Allo-HCT Refined ELN 2022 risk classification in allografted AML patients. The new classification refines the ELN 2022 risk classification, dividing adverse-risk patients into two subgroups: Adv-Plus (AdvP), including those with complex karyotype, MECOM (EVI1) rearrangement, or TP53 mutations/del(17p), and an additional adverse group (Adv*). The study included 651 AML patients treated with at least one line of anthracycline-based induction therapy and in complete remission. According to the Allo-HCT Refined ELN 2022 risk classification, 19.4% (n = 126) patients were classified into the Favorable (Fav) risk, 38.1% (n = 248) into the Intermediate (Int) risk, 27.2% (n = 177) in the Adv* and 15.4% (n = 100) in the AdvP. Outcomes were significantly poorer for patients allocated in the AdvP risk group (5-year OS rate: 32.3%, 5-year LFS rate: 24.3%, both p < 0.001 with the rest of subgroups) and a higher CIR (5-year CIR: 64.3%, p < 0.001). Patients in the Adv* risk group had similar outcomes than patients in the Int risk group (5-year OS rate: 70.2% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.69, 5-year LFS rate: 63.8% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.33). Multivariate analysis confirmed the dismal outcomes for AdvP patients for OS: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.05, and LFS: HR = 2.66, both p < 0.001. Our findings validate the Allo-HCT Refined ELN 2022 classification as a robust prognostic tool, particularly highlighting the poor outcomes for the AdvP subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.