ReviewCancer cell2025
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint therapy: Enabling insights into fundamental human immunology and clinical benefit.
Review in Cancer cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant tislelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: the exploratory NAIVE trial.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Plasticity of Non-Apoptotic Residual Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy: Epigenetic and Microenvironmental Determinants.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant BO-112 and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy with or without Nivolumab in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Preclinical and Phase I Results.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- TLR9-activating cholesterol azetidine derivative-assisted therapeutic vaccines for cancer immunotherapy.Science advances · 2026Article
- DRESIS 2.0: the comprehensive landscape of drug resistance information.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Human and financial consequences of herding in oncology drug development: clinical trials of TIGIT inhibitors.BMJ oncology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Evolving Approaches and Supporting Evidence.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Targeting Ion Channels for Cancer Therapy: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Exceptional response to chemo-immunotherapy in a patient with HER2-negative, TMB-high metastatic gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has revolutionized cancer treatment, most patients with advanced disease fail to achieve durable benefit. To address this challenge, it is essential to integrate mechanistic research with clinical studies to: (1) understand response mechanisms, (2) identify patient-specific resistance pathways, (3) develop biomarkers for patient selection, and (4) design novel therapies to overcome resistance. We propose that incorporating "direct-in-patient" studies into clinical trials is crucial for bridging the gap between fundamental science and clinical oncology. In this review, we first highlight recent clinical success of ICT in the neoadjuvant setting, where treatment is given in earlier disease stages to improve outcomes. We then explore how neoadjuvant clinical trials could be utilized to drive mechanistic laboratory-based investigations. Finally, we discuss novel scientific concepts that will potentially aid in overcoming resistance to ICT, which will require future clinical trials to understand their impact on human immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.