ArticleHearing research2025
The relationship between interaural coherence, interaural level differences, and binaural fusion.
Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Binaural pitch fusion in cochlear implant users is broader and narrower with coherent and incoherent envelope modulation, respectively.JASA express letters · 2026Article
- Validating a rapid psychophysical procedure for estimating interaural time difference thresholds.Hearing research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binaural fusion is the perception of a single auditory image when signals are presented to the two ears. Decreasing the interaural coherence of the signals often degrades binaural fusion. However, perception of interaural level differences (ILDs) is minimally affected by interaural coherence changes. This study aims to determine if there is an interaction between ILDs and binaural fusion in the presence of reduced interaural coherence. In Experiment 1, vocoded stimuli with varying envelope interaural coherences were presented containing a range of ILDs. Participants indicated the perceived size and lateralization of the auditory image they perceived. Stimuli with reduced interaural coherence were binaurally fused when there was a large ILD, even when participants indicated that the same stimulus was unfused when there was a 0 dB ILD. This suggests that signals with low interaural coherence can become binaurally fused when the stimulus has large ILDs. To determine if participants could choose to attend to only one ear for stimuli that were reported to be fused in the presence of ILDs in Experiment 1 (i.e. if complete binaural fusion occurred), participants indicated the perceived loudness in their right ear for stimuli with varying right-ear intensities in Experiment 2. When the stimulus had a left-biased ILD, participants had a reduced ability to report changes in right ear signal intensity, suggesting that largely complete binaural fusion was fostered by the presence of large ILDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.