ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
"It makes you feel worthless." The lived experience of discrimination in the US food assistance system.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixed methods analysis of the cultural acceptability and competence of SNAP in Rhode Island and Connecticut.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Association between parent-perceived neighborhood support on food insufficiency and public benefit participation among US children.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Domains of Housing Instability and Intimate Partner Violence Risk Among U.S. Tenants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the lived experience of judgment, mistreatment, and fear related to federal food assistance programs and the emergency food system among families experiencing food insecurity with specific attention to the intersections of holding multiple stigmatized identities while engaging with food assistance. Between November 2022 and June 2023, Feeding MI Families enrolled 781 English and Spanish-speaking parents experiencing food insecurity from 3 Michigan cities. Participants completed closed- and open-ended survey questions assessing their experiences of judgment, mistreatment, and fear related to using food assistance. Quantitative methods were used to identify similarities in these experiences across food assistance program use and sociodemographic characteristics, and qualitative methods were used to identify themes in participants' descriptions of their experiences. Approximately one-third of participants reported experiencing judgment due to using food assistance (38.4 %) or having worried about mistreatment by food assistance programs (37.5 %). Over half (54.8 %) of those born outside the US feared that using assistance would affect their immigration status. Participants described structural issues in the administration of food assistance programs as discriminatory. Often, these experiences were entwined with participants' gender, race, ethnicity, and language fluency. Participants also frequently spoke of interpersonal discrimination due to their use of food assistance, including being stereotyped as lazy, unemployed, and abusing the system. These experiences often occurred while grocery shopping, when one's use of food assistance can be on display. Social and structural interventions that combat stereotypes of food insecurity and improve the efficiency and dignity of food assistance systems could increase program utilization and impacts, particularly within communities that hold other stigmatized identities, decreasing the physical, emotional, and cognitive burden of food insecurity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.