ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Limited hiatal dissection versus Dor-fundoplication in laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: First experience in Morocco - A case control comparison study.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting success after laparoscopic heller myotomy: lessons from 22 years in a resource-limited context.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceLaparoscopic Heller myotomy is a primary treatment for achalasia, addressing impaired esophageal motility. Fundoplication is typically added to prevent postoperative reflux. This study compares outcomes of limited hiatal dissection without antireflux system in laparoscopic Heller myotomy to Dor fundoplication. CASE PRESENTATION: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients treated at visceral surgery department (2008-2022). Of these, 29 patients underwent limited hiatal dissection, and 16 underwent Dor fundoplication. A liquid diet was followed on day one, with discharge on day two, and a semi-liquid diet for three weeks. Outcomes included dysphagia resolution, postoperative Eckardt scores <3, and postoperative reflux incidence. The study compared operative and postoperative data between the two groups. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The limited hiatal dissection group had a slightly younger mean age (46.97 years) compared to the Dor fundoplication group (51.75 years). The limited hiatal dissection group had a higher proportion of men (58.6 %) while the Dor group had more women (56.3 %). Dysphagia (100 %) and weight loss (68.9 %) were prevalent symptoms. Perioperative complications and hospital stay duration were similar. Operative time was significantly shorter in the limited hiatal dissection group (96.7 vs. 118.3 min, p = 0.004). Both groups showed similar (OR = 0.519, CI = 0.066-4.083) and significant improvement in dysphagia (91.3 % vs. 87.5 %, p < 0.001) with comparable postoperative gastroesophageal disease (20.7 % vs. 25 %, p = 0.726 OR = 1.278, 95 % CI: 0.301-5.420).
conclusionLimited hiatal dissection provides comparable symptom relief and reflux prevention, offering a viable alternative to routine antireflux in achalasia treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.