ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2025
Prebiotic- and Panthenol-Containing Multipurpose Healing Dermocosmetics Post-Cryotherapy for Actinic Keratoses: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionActinic keratosis (AKs) is a precancerous skin lesion that can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma.
objectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dermocosmetic (DC) formulation containing prebiotic active ingredients (Aqua Posae Filiformis, a complex made of ferments, sugars, plant extracts, panthenol, madecassoside, and zinc) on healing time and local skin reactions (LSR) following cryotherapy of AKs and to compare the application of DC and boric acid 3% solution soaks (BA) vs. BA alone.
methodsSeventy-five adult patients presenting with a maximum of five isolated AKs on the face and/or scalp and who underwent cryotherapy (T0) were enrolled. Post-treatment, patients initiated the application of BA only or BA followed by DC once daily for 30 days (unblinded 1:1 randomization). The evaluation of efficacy in healing time and cosmetic outcomes was assessed 30 days post-treatment (T2); LSR was evaluated three days post-treatment (T1).
resultsThere was a gain of 4.5 days (40%) in healing time in the BA+DC group compared to the BA group, with a median time of seven days versus 11.5 days (P <0.0005). Additionally, 50% of lesions in complete response had an excellent cosmetic outcome with BA+DC vs. 20% with BA only. The majority of patients treated with BA+DC had mild LSR vs. moderate LSR with BA, with a median value of two vs three, respectively (P <0.0001).
conclusionThe addition of a prebiotic DC significantly reduced healing time, improved cosmetic outcomes, and minimized LSR post-cryotherapy. No adverse event was reported with this treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.