ReviewJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025
Digital Interventions for Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of active action observation on cognitive, emotional, motor, and somatosensory outcomes in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective exploratory case series.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic rheumatic condition requiring long-term, multidisciplinary treatment, which consumes significant health care resources and family energy. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of digital interventions on patient outcomes in individuals with JIA. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of digital interventions on alleviating symptoms and improving overall well-being in children and adolescents with JIA. Methods: A systematic search of 5 databases identified randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of digital interventions on physiological and psychological outcomes in adolescents and children (average age ≤19 y). Outcomes included pain, physical activity, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and disease-related issues. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened papers and extracted data on intervention functionalities and outcomes, assessing the risk of bias. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model synthesized the results. Results: The review included 11 studies involving 885 patients with JIA. Digital interventions included educational (eg, self-management training), therapeutic (eg, pain management), and behavioral (eg, promoting physical activity) approaches. These were delivered through websites, telephone consultations, video conferences, apps, and interactive games, with durations ranging from 8 to 24 weeks and no clear link observed between intervention length and outcomes. Compared with conventional control groups, digital interventions were significantly effective in alleviating pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.19, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.04) and enhancing physical activity levels (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.06-0.69). Marginal improvements in health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and disease-related issues were observed, but these did not reach statistical significance (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.11; SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.20; and SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.29, respectively). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach rated the quality of evidence for pain, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and disease-related issues as moderate, while the evidence quality for physical activity was assessed as low. Conclusions: Digital interventions can alleviate pain and enhance physical activity in patients with JIA. However, given the limited sample size and high risk of bias in some studies, further high-quality research is needed to improve the treatment and management of JIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.