ArticleMagyar onkologia2025
[First results of comprehensive genomic studies on solid tumours in National Institute of Oncology].
Article in Magyar onkologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe Molecular Pathology Laboratory of the National Institute of Oncology has been performing comprehensive genomic studies (500-gene panel) since 2021. This paper summarizes our results obtained between 2022 and 2024, focusing on clinical requests, the histological type of cases studied and the potential therapeutic benefit of identified variants.
methodsComprehensive genomic profiling was performed using next generation sequencing on an Ion S5 Plus system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus kit. DNA and RNA were extracted from formalin- fixed, paraffin-embedded samples.
results402 analyses were performed. We identified mutations with therapeutic significance in 37.3% (150/402) of cases, including 26.4% (106/402) of cases with on label therapies. The most frequently investigated cases were soft tissue sarcomas and gynaecological tumours.
conclusionsGenetic alterations with therapeutic relevance primarily include high TMB and high GIS. Previously unknown mutations suitable for targeted therapy were rarely identified, as almost all cases had previously undergone small targeted panel testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40117481PMC11929570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.