Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117385›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2025

Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric Reasoning.

Fangli Xia, Mitchell J Nathan, Kelsey E Schenck, Michael I Swart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Drawing or gesturing? Prior knowledge moderates the impact of embodied pedagogies.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fangli XiaDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-9042-2447
Mitchell J NathanDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Kelsey E SchenckDepartment of Teaching and Learning, Southern Methodist University.
Michael I SwartWisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task-relevant actions can facilitate mathematical thinking, even for complex topics, such as mathematical proof. We investigated whether such cognitive benefits also occur for action predictions. The action-cognition transduction (ACT) model posits a reciprocal relationship between movements and reasoning. Movements-imagined as well as real ones operating on real or imaginary objects-activate feedforward mechanisms for the plausible predicted outcomes of motor system planning, along with feedback from the effect actions have on the world. Thus, ACT posits cognitive influences for making action predictions regardless of whether those actions are performed. Using a two-by-two factorial design, we investigated how generating task-relevant action predictions or performing task-relevant directed actions influenced undergraduates' (N = 127) geometry proof performance. As predicted, making action predictions significantly enhanced participants' proof production. No evidence suggests that combining action predictions and directed actions provided additional benefits, supporting the claim that predicting and performing actions engage overlapping processes, as theorized by ACT. Gestural replays, reenactments of previously performed actions during explanations, were associated with significantly better insight and proof performance for both (actor-generated) predicted actions and (investigator-generated) directed actions. Prompting people to predict task-relevant actions enhances mathematical cognition, possibly through simulated actions of transformations on imagined mathematical objects, as revealed by increased production of speech describing mathematical operations and increased production of gestural replays. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings regarding the influences of embodied simulation of movements on cognition, and the educational implications of facilitating mathematical reasoning through interventions prompting students to perform and imagine performing task-relevant body movements.

Indexed as

CognitionImaginationMathematicsProblem SolvingThinkingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultAction‐cognition transductionAction predictionDirected actionEmbodied cognitionGeometric reasoningGesturePredictive architectureSpeech

Identifiers

PMID40117385
PMCPMC11927934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.