Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117374›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Unveiling the complexity of Arnold's tongues in a breathing-soliton laser.

Xiuqi Wu, Junsong Peng, Bo Yuan, Sonia Boscolo, Christophe Finot, Heping Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiuqi WuState Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, and Hainan Institute, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4360-3242
Junsong PengState Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, and Hainan Institute, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1432-5880
Bo YuanState Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, and Hainan Institute, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0009-0008-8106-5813
Sonia BoscoloAston Institute of Photonic Technologies, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-2893
Christophe FinotLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, UMR 6303 CNRS - Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21078 Dijon Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-5995
Heping ZengState Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, and Hainan Institute, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-4440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synchronization occurs ubiquitously in nature and science. The synchronization regions generally broaden monotonically with the strength of the forcing, thereby featuring a tongue-like shape in parameter space, known as Arnold's tongue. Such a shape is universal, prevailing in many diverse synchronized systems. Theoretical studies suggest that, under strong external forcing, the shape of the synchronization regions can change substantially and even holes can appear in the solid patterns. However, experimentally accessing these abnormal regimes is quite challenging mainly because many real-world systems displaying synchronization become fragile under strong forcing. Here, we are able to observe these intriguing regimes in a breathing-soliton laser. Two types of abnormal synchronization regions are unveiled, namely, a leaf- and a ray-like shape. High-resolution control of the loss allows holes to be revealed in the synchronization regions. Our work opens the possibility to study intriguing synchronization dynamics using a simple breathing-soliton laser as a test bed.

Identifiers

PMID40117374
PMCPMC11927660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.