ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2025
Mimics and challenging presentations of DADA2.
Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adenosine deaminase type 2 deficiency: From rare to common.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2) has been a challenging diagnosis to make since it was first described in 2014. The disease represents a wide range of phenotypes. Therefore, it may present with various clinical patterns. Throughout the years, several difficult-to-diagnose cases of DADA2 were reported in the literature. Although several studies and reviews were published regarding different phenotypes and manifestations of DADA2, a review of challenging cases with diverse combinations of DADA2 manifestations was needed to integrate the knowledge from the literature into the clinical practice. Immunological, hematologic, autoinflammatory, and adult-onset polyarteritis-nodosa patterns were reported in the literature as cases challenging to diagnose. In this review, we aim to summarize the challenging case reports from the literature, provide an algorithmic approach for these kinds of presentations, and share our perspective and recommendations on the topic. Diagnosing DADA2 on time is a vital issue for preventing fatal and debilitating vascular events with anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Thus, early testing for DADA2 in suspected cases is recommended. Family history and genetic testing of the patient and the first-degree relatives are essential for accurate diagnosis. Thorough systemic examination and imaging might help detect clinically silent findings of vasculitis. Enzymatic activity of ADA2, when available, is also a key diagnostic tool that complements genetic testing and clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.