ArticlePloS one2025
What is the cross-sectional association of geospatially derived walkability with walking for leisure and transport?
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of nonlinear associations between the built environment and walking in older adults.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBuilt environments have been shown to shape active living behaviours, including walking. However, this literature is drawn predominantly from Europe and North America. This study aimed to create a geospatially derived city-wide walkability index and further investigate the association with walking in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from participants in the 2014-15 MOVE-SE study in Belo Horizonte. A walkability index was created at the census tract level, which included net residential density, land use mix, and street connectivity, using ArcGIS software. Walking for leisure and transportation was self-reported via the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Covariates such as sociodemographic characteristics, health indicators, and neighbourhood context were measured. A multilevel negative binomial regression was employed, incorporating confounders across five combined models with sequential addition of covariate groups. All statistical analyses were conducted in R software with a significance threshold of 5%.
resultsThe study included 1,372 adults aged 18 years and older, with a female majority of 60.5%, a median age of 41, and 45.9% completed at most primary schooling. The family income for 63.7% ranged between one to three times the minimum wage. Self-rated health was considered good by 64.7% of participants, and the median Body Mass Index (BMI) was 26.2 kg/m2. Regarding neighbourhood context, the median length of residence was 15 years, per capita monthly income was US$175, and the average land slope was 8.2%. Participants reported a median of 180 minutes per week (interquartile range: 120 - 250) for walking for leisure and transportation. The median walkability index was -0.51 (interquartile range: -1.40 - 1.21). After adjusting for confounders, the final model indicated a positive association between the walkability index and walking for leisure (IRR: 1.33; CI95%:1.32-1.35; p < 0.001) and transportation (IRR: 1.22; CI95%:1.20-1.24; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate a positive association between higher levels of walkability and increased walking behaviours in various contexts. It underscores the importance of urban planning, design, and policy interventions tailored to local environments to promote walkability, reduce car dependency, and facilitate healthier lifestyles as part of everyday living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.