Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine delivered by the aerosol, intradermal and intramuscular routes in previously vaccinated young adults: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Sumanta Saha, Melanie Millier, Ari Samaranayaka, Liza Edmonds, Emma Best, James Ussher, Andrew Anglemyer, Jennifer Lee, Michael Tatley, Felicity Cutts and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sumanta SahaUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-8846
Melanie MillierUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.
Ari SamaranayakaUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.
Liza EdmondsVictoria University, Wellington New Zealand.
Emma BestThe University of Auckland, Auckland New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2667-5458
James UssherUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-7680
Andrew AnglemyerUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.
Jennifer LeeUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.
Michael TatleyUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.
Felicity CuttsThe London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Bloomsbury, UK.
Rob van BinnendijkNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven The Netherlands.
Peter McIntyreUniversity of Otago, Otago New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are increasing reports of outbreaks of measles in countries that achieved measles elimination using two doses of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, particularly in health care settings. While responses to a third dose of MMR in two-dose recipients have been examined, these studies have all administered MMR by the standard (intramuscular or subcutaneous) route, and data on the duration of antibody are limited. We have developed a protocol for an open-label parallel-arm randomized-controlled trial to compare measles antibody responses and safety after intradermal and aerosol administration of MMR with intramuscular, the usual mode of administration in Aotearoa (New Zealand).

methodsEligible participants are aged ≥ 18 years who have previously received two doses of the MMR vaccine and based on levels of IgG antibody to measles or mumps below the threshold for seropositivity in commercially available screening tests are required to receive the MMR vaccine prior to entering health professional training programs at Aotearoa universities. The participants will be randomized to three routes of administration (1:1:1) to receive the MMR vaccine by the intradermal (via microneedle), intrapulmonary (via vibrating mesh nebulizer), or intramuscular routes. The primary objective is to determine the proportion of participants who attain levels of measles IgG antibody above the seroprotective threshold using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay, with those in the lowest quartile validated by plaque neutralization assay, at days 6-8, 13-15, 28-42, and at 12-18 months post-vaccination. Secondary objectives include a fold increase in the geometric mean concentration of IgG antibody from baseline, and systemic and local reactions following delivery of MMR by each method. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Default.aspx; trial registration no. ACTRN12623000130662).

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineAdolescentAdultAerosolsAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansInjections, IntradermalInjections, IntramuscularMaleNew ZealandRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccinationYoung AdultAerosolsAntibodies, ViralMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID40117230
PMCPMC11927902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.