ArticlePloS one2025
Reform of agricultural land property rights system and grain production resilience: Empirical evidence based on China's "Three Rights Separation" reform.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The latest reform in China's agricultural land rights system has implemented the "Three Rights Separation" reform, distinguishing between ownership rights, contract rights, and management rights of rural land. This reform is a significant step taken by the Chinese government to ensure a rational allocation of agricultural land resources, contributing greatly to enhancing food production resilience and promoting food security. This paper analyzes panel data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2005 to 2021 to assess the resilience levels in grain production. It utilizes a multi-period Difference-in-Differences model to examine the effects of the separation of three rights of agricultural land on this resilience, including their mechanisms of action. The findings reveal that(1)although the resilience of grain production in China has progressively improved over the study period, it remains low, indicating substantial potential for enhancement;(2)The separation of three rights of agricultural land significantly boosts the resilience of grain production, a conclusion corroborated by robustness tests;(3)The analysis shows that the policy promotes resilience by facilitating land transfer and boosting investments in agricultural productivity;(4)Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy's impact is more pronounced in major grain-producing areas and central regions, with stronger effects observed in northern wheat-growing areas compared to southern rice-growing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.