Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117188›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

The neural correlates of novelty and variability in human decision-making under an active inference framework.

Shuo Zhang, Yan Tian, Quanying Liu, Haiyan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuo ZhangCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1303-793X
Yan TianCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Quanying LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Haiyan WuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-6636

Funding

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Advanced Biomaterials 2022B1212010003MYRG of University of Macau MYRG2022-00188-ICINational Natural Science Foundation of China 62001205NSFC-FDCT Joint Program 0095/2022/AFJShenzhen-Hong Kong-Macao Science and Technology Innovation Project SGDX2020110309280100Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee 2022410129Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee KCXFZ2020122117340001The National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFF1200804The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515012509The Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT) of Macau FDCT 0041/2022/AThe Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT) of Macau FDCT 0127/2020/A3The SRG of University of Macau SRG202000027-ICI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingAdultChoice BehaviorElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleUncertaintyYoung Adultactive inferenceneurosciencenonethe exploration-exploitation trade-offuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40117188
PMCPMC11928029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.