Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117177›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

Characteristics and filtering of low-frequency artificial short deletion variations based on nanopore sequencing.

Fuqiang Ye, Juanjuan Zhu, Xiaomin Zhang, Jiarong Zhang, Zihan Xie, Tingting Yang, Yifang Han, Xiaohong Yang, Zilin Ren, Ming Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fuqiang YeHuadong Research Institute for Medicine and Biotechniques, Nanjing 210002, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-5524
Juanjuan ZhuSchool of Life Science and Technology, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomin ZhangDepartment of Advanced & Interdisciplinary Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.
Jiarong ZhangDepartment of Advanced & Interdisciplinary Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.
Zihan XieDepartment of Advanced & Interdisciplinary Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.
Tingting YangDepartment of Advanced & Interdisciplinary Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.
Yifang HanHuadong Research Institute for Medicine and Biotechniques, Nanjing 210002, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohong YangHuadong Research Institute for Medicine and Biotechniques, Nanjing 210002, People's Republic of China.
Zilin RenChangchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun 130122, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3621-1024
Ming NiDepartment of Advanced & Interdisciplinary Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9465-2787

Funding

Medicine and Biotechniques 2024YQFH06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanopore sequencing is characterized by high portability and long reads, albeit accompanied by systematic errors causing short deletions. Few tools can filter low-frequency artificial deletions, especially in single samples.

resultsTo solve this problem, we first synthesized or purchased 17 DNA/RNA standards for nanopore sequencing with R9 and R10 flowcells to obtain benchmarking datasets. False-positive (FP) deletions were prevalent (75.86%-96.26%), while the majority (62.07%-79.68%) were located in homopolymeric regions. The 10-mer base-quality scores (Q scores) and sequencing speeds flanking the FP homopolymeric deletions marginally differed from the true-positive (TP) deletions. We thus investigated the raw current signals after normalizing them by length. We found more significant differences in current signals between the reads with and without FP deletions. Indexes including the MRPP A (Multiple Response Permutation Procedure, statistic A), the accumulative difference of normalized current signals, and the Q score were tested for the power of distinguishing between FP and TP deletions. MRPP A outperformed the other indexes in homopolymeric regions and achieved the highest accuracy of 76.73% for challenging 1-base homopolymeric deletions. When sequencing depth was low, the Q score performed better than MRPP A. We developed Delter (Deletion filter) to filter low-frequency FP deletions of nanopore sequencing in single samples, which removed 60.98% to 100% of artificial homopolymeric deletions in real samples.

conclusionsLow-frequency artificial short deletion variations, especially the most challenging homopolymeric deletions, could be effectively filtered by Delter using normalized current signals or Q scores according to the employed sequencing strategies.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNanoporesfilteringlow-frequency deletionsnanopore sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40117177
PMCPMC11927395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.