Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117068›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2025

Decreasing prevalence or increase in unregistered cases of bulimia nervosa in children and adolescents in Germany? A comparison using representative claims data pre- vs. intra-COVID-19 pandemic.

Jule Leickert, Stephan Zillmer, Christian J Bachmann, Annika Vivirito, Dirk Enders, Josephine Pintsch, Christoph U Correll, Charlotte Jaite

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jule Leickert *Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy in Childhood and Adolescence, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany.
Stephan Zillmer *Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy in Childhood and Adolescence, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany.
Christian J BachmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Annika ViviritoIngef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin Gmbh, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk EndersIngef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin Gmbh, Berlin, Germany.
Josephine PintschDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt Universitaet Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt Universitaet Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Charlotte JaiteDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy in Childhood and Adolescence, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany. jaite@uni-hildesheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to analyze data of children and adolescents in Germany insured according to legal requirements (statutorily insured) regarding epidemiology, comorbidities, and care of bulimia nervosa (BN) pre- vs. intra-COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe study is based on anonymized claims data of 10-17.9 years old children and adolescents statutorily insured in Germany from the InGef Berlin GmbH research database. The database combines data of more than 50 statutory health insurances and is representative of the German population. Prevalence, (quarterly) incidence, comorbidities and in- and outpatient treatment of BN (ICD-10: F50.2/F50.3) pre-COVID (01/2018-03/2020; N = 282,711) vs. intra-COVID (04/2020-12/2021; N = 282,738) was compared using descriptives and χ

resultsPrevalence of BN was 0.09% pre-COVID and 0.07% intra-COVID (OR = 0.78 [0.65, 0.93]). After pandemic onset, a positive trend in the quarterly incidence among adolescents was observed (p = .016). Outpatient visits to general practitioners decreased (OR = 0.59 [0.35, 0.98]).

conclusionThe observed decline in diagnosed and treated BN cases and the positive trend in quarterly incidence could be attributed to an increase in unregistered cases due to the overburdened care situation that emerged with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers and healthcare providers need to be aware of the potential for a backlash and deterioration/chronification of BN symptoms in children and adolescents. Level of evidence No level of evidence.

Indexed as

Bulimia NervosaCOVID-19AdolescentChildComorbidityFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMalePandemicsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2AdolescentsBulimia nervosaChildrenCOVID-19EpidemiologyGermanyHealth care services

Identifiers

PMID40117068
PMCPMC11928349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.