ArticleSpine deformity2025
Are abnormal preoperative hematological screening tests associated with allogeneic transfusion in idiopathic scoliosis surgery?
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies have suggested routine preoperative laboratory assessment may be unnecessary or excessive. The primary aim of this study was to determine the association between abnormal preoperative laboratory screening tests on allogeneic transfusion in pediatric patients receiving posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis correction.
methodsThe NSQIP Pediatric database for years 2016-2022 was used. Patients who were (1) < 18 years old, (2) received posterior arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis correction, and (3) had recorded preoperative laboratory tests were included in this study. Preoperative bloodwork values of interest were hematocrit, albumin, platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient demographics, surgical metrics, and preoperative laboratory values. Rate of allogeneic transfusion was stratified by laboratory value cut-offs and compared using G-test. Standardized cut-offs were used to define abnormal values. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of abnormal bloodwork values on rate of allogeneic transfusion.
resultsThere were 6057 patients included in this study. The mean age was 13.8 years. There were 13.6% that received allogeneic transfusion. The mean transfusion volume was 62.1 mL. Patients with abnormal preoperative INR (13.1% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001), hematocrit < 35 (12.4% vs. 25.9%; p < 0.001), and albumin < 3.4 (13.4% vs. 25.8%; p = 0.004) had higher rates of transfusion. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, INR > 1.2 (OR 1.4, p = 0.023) and hematocrit < 35 (OR 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher odds of allogeneic transfusion.
conclusionPreoperative INR and hematocrit values can aid in risk stratification for allogeneic transfusion requirements. PTT and platelet count did not significantly impact perioperative transfusion rates or volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40117065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.