Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117036›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2025

How can physical activity promotion be optimised in general practice: a narrative review of the literature.

Stephen Dolan, Andrew O'Regan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen DolanDepartment of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick School of Medicine, Limerick City, Ireland. Sdolan.ennis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4321-6141
Andrew O'ReganHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity is a significant contributor to preventable chronic health conditions worldwide. General practice has been identified as a setting to improve physical activity levels through exercise promotion during consultations. However, physical activity promotion in general practice is unstructured and suboptimal.

aimsThe aim of this study is to review the literature pertaining to factors that influence physical activity promotion in general practice and to answer the research question: what are the experiences of patients and GPs with physical activity promotion in consultations?

methodsOnline databases were searched for relevant papers using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers retrieved were original research only, involving patients, general practitioners or practice nurses. A PRISMA approach to study selection was followed.

resultsOf 464 papers retrieved, 20 were included in the review. Physical activity promotion is acceptable to patients but some do not appreciate its health benefits. A personalised approach is important to patients, including tailored advice and setting meaningful goals. Studies involving general practitioners and practice nurses report that they are aware of the importance of physical activity and their role in its promotion, but time is the primary barrier. Strategies identified include demedicalisation of physical activity, resources such as patient handouts as well as signposting to community initiatives, social prescribers and collaboration with exercise professionals.

conclusionGeneral practice has the potential to effectively promote physical activity but system- and practitioner-level changes are necessary to achieve meaningful change.

Indexed as

ExerciseGeneral PracticeHealth PromotionGeneral PractitionersHumansExercise is medicineGeneral practicePhysical activityPrimary careReview

Identifiers

PMID40117036
PMCPMC12276137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.