ReviewIrish journal of medical science2025
How can physical activity promotion be optimised in general practice: a narrative review of the literature.
Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Physical Activity with Sports Scientist (PASS) Programme Among Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Trial
- Leveraging physical activity data in chronic disease management: a novel approach in Irish general practice.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Effects of Physical Activity on Ageism and Aging Anxiety Among Chinese and Korean Adults Aged 55 to 64 Years.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical inactivity is a significant contributor to preventable chronic health conditions worldwide. General practice has been identified as a setting to improve physical activity levels through exercise promotion during consultations. However, physical activity promotion in general practice is unstructured and suboptimal.
aimsThe aim of this study is to review the literature pertaining to factors that influence physical activity promotion in general practice and to answer the research question: what are the experiences of patients and GPs with physical activity promotion in consultations?
methodsOnline databases were searched for relevant papers using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers retrieved were original research only, involving patients, general practitioners or practice nurses. A PRISMA approach to study selection was followed.
resultsOf 464 papers retrieved, 20 were included in the review. Physical activity promotion is acceptable to patients but some do not appreciate its health benefits. A personalised approach is important to patients, including tailored advice and setting meaningful goals. Studies involving general practitioners and practice nurses report that they are aware of the importance of physical activity and their role in its promotion, but time is the primary barrier. Strategies identified include demedicalisation of physical activity, resources such as patient handouts as well as signposting to community initiatives, social prescribers and collaboration with exercise professionals.
conclusionGeneral practice has the potential to effectively promote physical activity but system- and practitioner-level changes are necessary to achieve meaningful change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.