Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40117026›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

From Privilege to Threat: Unraveling Psychological Pathways to the Manosphere.

Brooke Franklin-Paddock, Michael J Platow, Michelle K Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brooke Franklin-PaddockSchool of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. Brooke.Franklin-Paddock@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0009-0009-4557-3949
Michael J PlatowSchool of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1721-0827
Michelle K RyanGlobal Institute for Women's Leadership, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1091-9275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this research, we explore how identity influences the adoption of misogynistic beliefs central to the manosphere, online communities known for sexism and linked to increasing extremism and real-world violence against women. Through two correlational studies (Study 1: N = 311; Study 2: N = 470), we examined how identity factors related to privilege, identification, and perceived threat from feminism predict the endorsement of manosphere attitudes. We focus on two key manosphere attitudes: anti-feminism and evolutionary beliefs about women's manipulative nature. As predicted, results showed that the less men acknowledge their privileged status relative to women, the more they feel threatened by feminists, which in turn was associated with endorsing manosphere attitudes. In Study 2, we found evidence that perceptions of status stability moderate this relationship. Men who recognized their privilege and foresee changing gender dynamics reported feeling less threatened and showed lower affinity for manosphere attitudes. We discuss the potential for mitigating the appeal of manosphere attitudes and emphasized the need for future research on conceptualizations of masculine identity and updated measures of sexism that reflect the content of contemporary gender discourse and the manosphere.

Indexed as

AttitudeFeminismGender IdentitySexismAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMasculinityYoung AdultAnti-feminismIdentityIncelsManosphereOnline misogynySexism

Identifiers

PMID40117026
PMCPMC12011899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.