ReviewPaediatric drugs2025
Emerging Treatments in Neonatal Fungal Infections: Progress and Prospects.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brazilian Propolis in the Context of Pathogens Associated with Neonatal Infections: An Antibacterial and Antiviral Approach.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Case Report: Multidisciplinary management and nursing care for a preterm infant with rare extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor: a clinical case study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal infections in neonates are potentially life threatening. The differential diagnosis for neonatal rashes is extensive, with common culprits including both bacteria and fungi. Candida albicans is the predominant fungal pathogen, causing infections that range from superficial disease to severe systemic conditions, including sepsis and meningitis. Neonates, especially those who are preterm, are particularly susceptible because of developmentally immature immune systems and the use of invasive procedures and devices in neonatal intensive care units. Congenital cutaneous candidiasis, acquired in utero or during delivery, can lead to disseminated infection with high mortality rates. Early diagnosis and prompt antifungal treatment are crucial but challenging because of subtle clinical presentations, making accurate identification of the offending organism essential for selecting the appropriate treatment. Candida species account for the majority of neonatal fungal infections, with different species necessitating distinct treatments because of varying susceptibility profiles. Aspergillus, another significant pathogen, poses high mortality risks and can present either cutaneously or systemically. Malassezia, though less common, primarily affects preterm infants with catheter-related fungemia. Other fungal species, including Zygomycetes, Trichosporon, and Cryptococcus, rarely produce neonatal infections but are noteworthy for consideration. Treatment of fungal infection is critical despite the relative paucity of information regarding the clinical pharmacology of many antifungal drugs in neonates. We review the major antifungal agents (e.g., amphotericin B, the echinocandins, the azoles) and provide pharmacologic and dosing information. Finally, preventive strategies, including the use of stringent aseptic techniques and careful clinical monitoring, are essential to mitigate both the incidence and severity of these infections in neonates and infants in the first months of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40117020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.