ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Scientific evidence on the impact of endolaser in aesthetics: scoping review.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facial endolaser treatment using a optical fiber connected to a 1444 nm Nd:YAG laser: Preliminary outcomes.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Synergistic Effects of Endolift With Complementary Cosmetic Procedures: A Narrative Review and Comprehensive Approach.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Advances in Nano-Phototherapy for Targeted Fat Reduction: From Mechanisms to Clinical Translation in Obesity.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to comprehensively analyze the literature related to the use of endolaser in aesthetic procedures, with the aim of mapping and synthesizing the available evidence. We used the JBI methodology for scoping reviews, conducting direct searches in the PUBMED, Scielo, and Cochrane databases. Due to the limited number of publications in this area, studies with various designs were included, with no restrictions on database, year, or language of publication. The search strategy incorporated the use of Boolean operators to refine the results, employing "AND," "OR," and "NOT" with descriptors such as "endolaser," "endolift," "esthetics," and "treatment." The search was conducted between November 2023 and April 2024. Study selection followed an initial screening with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data synthesis provided a comprehensive overview of current trends and gaps identified in the literature. Two independent reviewers analyzed the included studies, totaling 26 publications categorized as follows: randomized controlled trial (1), case series (23), case study (1), and pilot study (1). The results highlighted considerable variability in treatment protocols. Positive effects observed included localized fat reduction, skin rejuvenation, and reduction in the appearance of acne scars, keloids, and progressive lipodystrophy. The findings underscore the need for additional research to establish standardized protocols, better understand the underlying mechanisms, and evaluate the long-term sustainability of results. This gap in the literature presents an opportunity for further in-depth investigations in the field of endolaser aesthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40116960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.