ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Behavioural and cognitive profiles in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- The Utility of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) in Differentiating Neurodegenerative Disorders with Psychotic Symptoms: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating attractor dynamics and connectivity features for EEG-based dementia classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Functional Impairment in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: Cognitive, Behavioral, Personality, and Brain Perfusion Contributions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Modeling contributions of cognition and apathy to functional impairment in younger-onset dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLongitudinal comparative characterisation of dementia syndromes may aid differential diagnosis, prognostication and intervention implementation.
methodsWe compared the behavioural and cognitive characteristics of 84 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 29 left and 14 right-dominant semantic dementia (SDL and SDR) and 49 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients over a follow-up period of 2.4 ± 1.6 years using the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory Revised (CBI-R) and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination third edition (ACE-III).
resultsLinear mixed modelling of time effects found progression of all CBI-R domains, aside from sleep, beliefs and mood domains, and all ACE-III domains. Modelling of group effects found that bvFTD had greater symptoms than AD in most CBI-R domains. Notably, SDL and SDR compared differently with AD and bvFTD; whilst SDR did not differ significantly from bvFTD in any CBI-R domain, SDL had less severe symptoms than bvFTD in everyday skills, motivation, sleep and eating habits; whilst SDL had greater disturbances in abnormal behaviour and stereotypic behaviour than AD, SDR had greater disturbances in addition in motivation and eating habits. Motivation, eating habits, abnormal behaviour and stereotypic behaviour were the most frequently different behavioural domains between groups.
conclusionWe have shown that the combined, longitudinal use of existing behavioural and cognitive assessments could capture distinct clinical profiles of common and rare dementia syndromes. Our findings also highlight the importance of select behavioural domains such as motivation and the usefulness of separate clinical characterisations of SDL and SDR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.