ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
The value of simulation testing for the evaluation of ambient digital scribes: a case report.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- For the record: a narrative review of ambient voice technology in clinical documentation for dentistry and wider healthcare.British dental journal · 2026Review
- A Conceptual Model for Ambient AI Adoption: Perspectives From Academia and Industry.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Please document the nature of the medical emergency.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Exploring Ambient Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Learning and Feedback During Operating Room-to-Intensive Care Unit Handoffs: Co-Design and Simulation Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations for clinical adoption of ambient digital scribe technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Digital Mental Health Through an Intersectional Lens: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Quality and Safety of Ambient Digital Scribe Platforms Using Simulated Ambulatory Encounters.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Enhancing Structured Team Communication in Acute Care Settings with Ambient AI Scribes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this work is to demonstrate the value of simulation testing for rapidly evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) products. MATERIALS AND
methodsResearcher-physician teams simulated the use of 2 Ambient Digital Scribe (ADS) products by reading scripts of outpatient encounters while using both products, yielding a total of 44 draft notes. Time to edit, perceived amount of effort and editing, and errors in the AI-generated draft notes were analyzed.
resultsAmbient Digital Scribe Product A draft notes took significantly longer to edit, had fewer omissions, and more additions and irrelevant or misplaced text errors than ADS Product B. Ambient Digital Scribe Product A was rated as performing better for most encounters. DISCUSSION: Artificial intelligence-enabled products are being rapidly developed and implemented into practice, outpacing safety concerns. Simulation testing can efficiently identify safety issues.
conclusionSimulation testing is a crucial first step to take when evaluating AI-enabled technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.