ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Development of a machine learning-based tension measurement method in robotic surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of intraoperative force quantification during robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a prospective case series using integrated force-sensing technology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical mechanism and clinical management progress of surgical wound tension.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver 300,000 colorectal surgeries are performed annually in the U.S. with up to 10% complicated by anastomotic leaks, which cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its significant association with anastomotic leaks, tension is predominantly assessed intraoperatively using subjective metrics. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a novel objective method to assess mechanical tension in ex vivo porcine colons.
methodsThis research was conducted using the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK). First, a machine learning algorithm based on a long short-term memory neural network was developed to estimate the pulling forces on robotic arms of dVRK. Next, two robotic arms were used to apply upward forces to five ex vivo porcine colon segments. A force sensor was placed underneath the colons to measure ground-truth forces, which were compared to estimated forces calculated by the machine learning algorithm. Root mean square error and Spearman's Correlation were calculated to evaluate force estimation accuracy and correlation between measured and estimated forces, respectively.
resultsMeasured forces ranged from 0 to 17.2 N for an average experiment duration of two minutes. The algorithm's force estimates closely tracked the ground-truth sensor measurements with an accuracy of up to 88% and an average accuracy of 74% across all experiments. The estimated and measured forces showed a very strong correlation, with no Spearman's Correlation less than 0.80 across all experiments.
conclusionThis study proposes a machine learning algorithm that estimates colonic tension with a close approximation to ground-truth data from a force sensor. This is the first study to objectively measure tissue tension (and report it in Newtons) using a robot. Our method can be adapted to measure tension on multiple types of tissue and can help prevent surgical complications and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40116899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.