ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Trust and Acceptance Challenges in the Adoption of AI Applications in Health Care: Quantitative Survey Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trust in Generative AI for Health Information Consumption and the Effect of Learned Dependency: Randomized Controlled Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Alleviating Nurse Burnout With an Artificial Intelligence-Selected Mobile Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Intervention: Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Trust and Technology Acceptance: Comparing Traditional Search Engines and Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer Information Seeking.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- The benefits and future potential of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) on mental health: a Delphi study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Professionals' Context-Specific Trust in AI-Based Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Advancing foundational models in digital health technology adoption: A systematic literature review of multidisciplinary factors.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prehospital Tele-Emergency Medicine: A Survey of Acceptance and Attitudes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bayesian Analysis of AI-Driven Cost Savings in UK and Australian Health Care Systems: Cross-Sector Implementation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Perception and accuracy of an AI-based contactless wellness screening system in dental setting; a cross-sectional study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Consumer Perspectives on Trust in and Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Patient Perceptions on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Creating Clinical Research Documents: Survey Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Integration of Federated Learning and Blockchain in Health Care: Tutorial on Medical Data, Architectures, Privacy, Security, and Regulatory Compliance.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Role of Rating Valence in AI Skin Cancer App Acceptance: Eye-Tracking and Questionnaire Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Article
- Role of Technology Acceptance in the Telerehabilitation of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: Longitudinal Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence For 6P Medicine: Consolidating AI Needs of Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory, Precision, and Public Health Trajectories.Journal of medical systems · 2026Review
- Understanding surgeon adoption of artificial intelligence surgical technology: integrating UTAUT-TOE model.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A bridge, not a destination: YouTube viewer perspectives on AI mental health support and human therapy.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has potential to transform health care, but its successful implementation depends on the trust and acceptance of consumers and patients. Understanding the factors that influence attitudes toward AI is crucial for effective adoption. Despite AI's growing integration into health care, consumer and patient acceptance remains a critical challenge. Research has largely focused on applications or attitudes, lacking a comprehensive analysis of how factors, such as demographics, personality traits, technology attitudes, and AI knowledge, affect and interact across different health care AI contexts.
objectiveWe aimed to investigate people's trust in and acceptance of AI across health care use cases and determine how context and perceived risk affect individuals' propensity to trust and accept AI in specific health care scenarios.
methodsWe collected and analyzed web-based survey data from 1100 Finnish participants, presenting them with 8 AI use cases in health care: 5 (62%) noninvasive applications (eg, activity monitoring and mental health support) and 3 (38%) physical interventions (eg, AI-controlled robotic surgery). Respondents evaluated intention to use, trust, and willingness to trade off personal data for these use cases. Gradient boosted tree regression models were trained to predict responses based on 33 demographic-, personality-, and technology-related variables. To interpret the results of our predictive models, we used the Shapley additive explanations method, a game theory-based approach for explaining the output of machine learning models. It quantifies the contribution of each feature to individual predictions, allowing us to determine the relative importance of various demographic-, personality-, and technology-related factors and their interactions in shaping participants' trust in and acceptance of AI in health care.
resultsConsumer attitudes toward technology, technology use, and personality traits were the primary drivers of trust and intention to use AI in health care. Use cases were ranked by acceptance, with noninvasive monitors being the most preferred. However, the specific use case had less impact in general than expected. Nonlinear dependencies were observed, including an inverted U-shaped pattern in positivity toward AI based on self-reported AI knowledge. Certain personality traits, such as being more disorganized and careless, were associated with more positive attitudes toward AI in health care. Women seemed more cautious about AI applications in health care than men.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the complex interplay of factors influencing trust and acceptance of AI in health care. Consumer trust and intention to use AI in health care are driven by technology attitudes and use rather than specific use cases. AI service providers should consider demographic factors, personality traits, and technology attitudes when designing and implementing AI systems in health care. The study demonstrates the potential of using predictive AI models as decision-making tools for implementing and interacting with clients in health care AI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.