Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40116825›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

External Validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score in Children With Suspected Community-Acquired Sepsis.

Elliot Long, Meredith L Borland, Shane George, Shefali Jani, Eunicia Tan, Natalie Phillips, Amit Kochar, Simon Craig, Anna Lithgow, Arjun Rao and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Utility of Phoenix Sepsis Score for Predicting Mortality in Pediatric Sepsis: A Prospective Analytical Study from a Resource-limited Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Eastern India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Elliot LongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Meredith L BorlandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Shane GeorgeDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Children's Critical Care, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Shefali JaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Eunicia TanMiddlemore Hospital, Aukland, New Zealand.
Natalie PhillipsEmergency Department, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Amit KocharDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Women and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Simon CraigClinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anna LithgowDepartment of Paediatrics, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia.
Arjun RaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Stuart DalzielDepartment of Surgery and Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ed OakleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen HearpsClinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ben GelbartClinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah McNabClinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Fran BalamuthDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Scott L WeissNemours Children's Health and Sydney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nathan KuppermannDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, the George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, and Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Charlotte BradClinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Amanda WilliamsClinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Franz E BablDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The novel Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria were derived and validated using a multicountry dataset and proposed as a new definition for sepsis in children. Objective: To externally validate the Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria in a cohort of children hospitalized with suspected community-acquired sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used data from the multicenter, multicountry Sepsis Epidemiology in Australian and New Zealand Emergency Departments (SENTINEL) study, collected from 2021 to 2023 and including 90-day follow-up. Children admitted to the hospital through 11 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand and treated with parenteral antibiotics with either (1) a provisional diagnosis of sepsis or (2) treatment for sepsis (intravenous fluid bolus to treat poor perfusion) were included. Exposure: Development of organ dysfunction over the first 24 hours of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were (1) in-hospital mortality and (2) death or requirement for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) within 72 hours of hospitalization. Results: A total of 6232 children were included in the analysis, with a median (IQR) age of 2.1 (0.3-7.1) years, 3386 (54.1%) male, in-hospital mortality of 60 (1.0%), and death or ECLS within 72 hours in 36 (0.6%). In this population, the worst Phoenix Sepsis Score calculated over the first 24 hours of hospitalization had an area under the precision recall curve of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.07-0.28) for predicting in-hospital mortality and 0.23 (95% CI, 0.11-0.36) for predicting death or ECLS within 72 hours. Overall, 306 children (4.9%) met the Phoenix sepsis criteria, of whom 33 (10.8%) died in the hospital (nearly half of the total number who died) and 28 (9.2%) died or required ECLS within 72 hours. The Phoenix sepsis criteria had a sensitivity of 55.0% (95% CI, 41.6%-67.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.8% (95% CI, 7.6%-14.9%) for in-hospital mortality and sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI, 60.8%-89.9%) and PPV of 9.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-13.0%) for death or ECLS within 72 hours. Coagulation data for the calculation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score were missing in more than 85% of children. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter diagnostic study of children hospitalized with suspected sepsis, the Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria had similar performance to the original derivation and validation cohorts. The small proportion of children meeting Phoenix sepsis criteria, missingness of data, timing of application, and lack of sensitivity for in-hospital mortality limit the clinical utility of the criteria.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsSepsisAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfantMaleNew ZealandSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID40116825
PMCPMC11929021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.