ArticleJAMA network open2025
External Validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score in Children With Suspected Community-Acquired Sepsis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discrimination performance of the Phoenix sepsis score versus pediatric sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill children: a multicenter external validation study.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- External validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score in a paediatric intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of Phoenix Sepsis Score and traditional scoring systems in predicting mortality in PICU patients with suspected infection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pediatric Sepsis: Evolving Subphenotypes, Overlap Syndromes, and the Path to Precision Therapies.Clinics in chest medicine · 2026Review
- Vasoactive drug use in children with community acquired septic shock in Australia and New Zealand.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Early ARDS in Children with Sepsis in the PICU: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a sepsis prediction model using inflammatory and hemodynamic markers in the emergency department.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Utility of Phoenix Sepsis Score for Predicting Mortality in Pediatric Sepsis: A Prospective Analytical Study from a Resource-limited Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Eastern India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Application of New Pediatric Sepsis Definition to a Multicenter Observational Cohort of Previously Enrolled Severe Sepsis Patients Defined by SIRS Plus Organ Dysfunction.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2025Observational
- Pediatric sepsis prediction: Human in the loop framework.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Protocol for a multi-country retrospective observational paediatric sepsis epidemiological study (SENTINEL International).BMJ open · 2025Article
- We Have New Sepsis Criteria for Children…Now What?Hospital pediatrics · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of community acquired sepsis in children in Australia and New Zealand: a multicentre prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Risk factors for mortality and development of a predictive model in pediatric sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Comparison of Pediatric Risk of Mortality-III, Phoenix Sepsis, and pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores for predicting septic shock in Vietnamese children with sepsis.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
- Predicting Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes: A Comparison of 3 Sepsis Risk Scores in Bangladesh.Sage open pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The novel Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria were derived and validated using a multicountry dataset and proposed as a new definition for sepsis in children. Objective: To externally validate the Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria in a cohort of children hospitalized with suspected community-acquired sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used data from the multicenter, multicountry Sepsis Epidemiology in Australian and New Zealand Emergency Departments (SENTINEL) study, collected from 2021 to 2023 and including 90-day follow-up. Children admitted to the hospital through 11 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand and treated with parenteral antibiotics with either (1) a provisional diagnosis of sepsis or (2) treatment for sepsis (intravenous fluid bolus to treat poor perfusion) were included. Exposure: Development of organ dysfunction over the first 24 hours of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were (1) in-hospital mortality and (2) death or requirement for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) within 72 hours of hospitalization. Results: A total of 6232 children were included in the analysis, with a median (IQR) age of 2.1 (0.3-7.1) years, 3386 (54.1%) male, in-hospital mortality of 60 (1.0%), and death or ECLS within 72 hours in 36 (0.6%). In this population, the worst Phoenix Sepsis Score calculated over the first 24 hours of hospitalization had an area under the precision recall curve of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.07-0.28) for predicting in-hospital mortality and 0.23 (95% CI, 0.11-0.36) for predicting death or ECLS within 72 hours. Overall, 306 children (4.9%) met the Phoenix sepsis criteria, of whom 33 (10.8%) died in the hospital (nearly half of the total number who died) and 28 (9.2%) died or required ECLS within 72 hours. The Phoenix sepsis criteria had a sensitivity of 55.0% (95% CI, 41.6%-67.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.8% (95% CI, 7.6%-14.9%) for in-hospital mortality and sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI, 60.8%-89.9%) and PPV of 9.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-13.0%) for death or ECLS within 72 hours. Coagulation data for the calculation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score were missing in more than 85% of children. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter diagnostic study of children hospitalized with suspected sepsis, the Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria had similar performance to the original derivation and validation cohorts. The small proportion of children meeting Phoenix sepsis criteria, missingness of data, timing of application, and lack of sensitivity for in-hospital mortality limit the clinical utility of the criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.