Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40116766›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

User Experience of a Bespoke Videoconferencing System for Web-Based Family Visitation for Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: 1-Year Cross-Sectional Survey of Nursing Staff.

Aoife Murray, Irial Conroy, Frank Kirrane, Leonie Cullen, Hemendra Worlikar, Derek T O'Keeffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aoife MurrayHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91TK33, Ireland, 353 091492147.ORCID 0000-0002-1986-9414
Irial ConroyHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91TK33, Ireland, 353 091492147.ORCID 0000-0002-2761-3814
Frank KirraneDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0716-625X
Leonie CullenCritical Care Department, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0006-3167-9142
Hemendra WorlikarHealth Innovation Via Engineering Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91TK33, Ireland, 353 091492147.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-2616
Derek T O'KeeffeSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-2382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person visitation within hospitals was restricted and sometimes eliminated to reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Many health care professionals created novel strategies that were deployed to maintain a patient-centered approach. Although pandemic-related restrictions have eased, these systems, including videoconferencing or web-based bedside visits, remain relevant for visitors who cannot be present due to other reasons (lack of access to transport, socioeconomic restraints, geographical distance, etc). Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to report the experience of intensive care nursing staff using a bespoke videoconferencing system called ICU FamilyLink; (2) to examine the scenarios in which the nursing staff used the system; and (3) to assess the future use of videoconferencing systems to enhance communication with families. Methods: A modified Telehealth Usability questionnaire was administered to the nursing staff (N=22) of an intensive care unit in a model 4 tertiary hospital in Ireland 1 year after implementing the bespoke videoconferencing system. Results: In total, 22 nurses working in the intensive care department at University Hospital Galway, Ireland, responded to the survey. A total of 23% (n=5) of participants were between the ages of 25 and 34 years, 54% (n=12) were between 35 and 44 years, and 23% (n=5) were between 45 and 54 years. Most (n=15, 68%) of the participants reported never using videoconferencing in the intensive care setting to communicate with family members before March 2020. The modified Telehealth Usability Questionnaire showed overall satisfaction scores for each subcategory of ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, reliability, satisfaction and future use, and usefulness. In total, 21 (95%) participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, "I would use the ICU FamilyLink system in future circumstances in which family members cannot be physically present (ie, pandemics, abroad, inability to travel, etc)," and 1 participant responded neutrally. One participant highlighted a common scenario in intensive care settings in which a videoconferencing system can be used "Even without COVID, web-based communication is important when patients become unexpectedly ill and when families are abroad." Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into health care professionals' experience using a videoconferencing system to facilitate web-based visits for families. We conclude that videoconferencing systems when appropriately tailored to the environment with the users in mind can be an acceptable solution to maintain communication with family members who cannot be physically present at the bedside. The bespoke videoconferencing system had an overall positive response from 22 nursing staff who interacted with the system at varying frequency levels.

Indexed as

COVID-19FamilyIntensive Care UnitsNursing Staff, HospitalVideoconferencingVisitors to PatientsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetIrelandMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairescommunicationCOVID-19critical carecross-sectional surveyfamilyhealthICUintensive careintensive care unitnursingquestionnairereliabilitySARS-COV-2satisfactiontelehealthtelemedicinetransmissiontransmission riskusabilityusability questionnaireusefulnessvideoconferencingweb-based

Identifiers

PMID40116766
PMCPMC11951810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.