ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025
A Comparison of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Measures and the Association with Survival among Black and White Women with Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of patient neighborhood area deprivation index on prognostic factors and outcomes in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a retrospective multi-center healthcare network analysis.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation and Perceived Discrimination Among Endometrial Cancer Survivors.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlack women with endometrial cancer have twice the mortality compared with White. Survival disparities remain after accounting for individual-level socioeconomic and cancer-related factors. We investigated associations between area-based deprivation and survival and explored whether area-based deprivation attenuates the association between race and survival, among a cohort of Black and White women.
methodsData from endometrial cancers diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 were collected from a comprehensive cancer registry covering Metropolitan Detroit. Addresses at diagnosis were linked to the area deprivation (ADI) and social vulnerability (SVI) indices. Adjusted Fine and Gray models and Cox proportional hazard models were run investigating associations between area-based deprivation measures and survival; analyses were conducted estimating the proportion of the association between race and survival that was attenuated by area-based measures.
resultsHigher deprivation was associated with poorer survival, adjusted for race, insurance status, and tumor characteristics. Compared with the least disadvantaged quartile, the quartile with the highest disadvantage using ADI and SVI had 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.99-1.43] and 1.40 (1.14-1.71) times the hazard of endometrial cancer-specific mortality, respectively. ADI and SVI attenuated 18% (3%-38%) and 27% (10%-48%) of associations between race and mortality overall and 24% (95% CI, 3%-61%) and 40% (95% CI, 16%-78%) among those with high-grade histology.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates a clear association between neighborhood-level disadvantage and survival among women with endometrial cancer living in Metropolitan Detroit. Neighborhood disadvantage attenuates the relationship between race and survival, particularly among those with high-grade histology. IMPACT: These findings serve as motivation to understand how neighborhood affects cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.