Observational studyThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
A retrospective observational cohort study of oral azithromycin treatment for Legionnaires' disease.
Observational study in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Antimicrobial susceptibility of Legionella gormanii: species-specific ECOFFs, distinct MICs for rifampin versus Legionella pneumophila.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLegionnaires' disease (LD) is typically treated with macrolides, including the azalide azithromycin, or quinolones. In 2013, guidelines for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand were changed to prioritize oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin.
objectivesTo determine whether the change in antimicrobial guidelines led to altered outcomes for patients subsequently confirmed to have LD.
methodsPatients with confirmed LD between 2010 and 2020 were identified from clinical and laboratory data. Hospital records were used to identify mortality, ICU admission, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability, and time to first anti-Legionella treatment. Mean differences, risk ratios (RRs) and an interrupted time series with propensity adjustment were used to compare patient outcomes before and after the guideline change.
resultsThere were 323 patients included: 128 before and 195 after the change. Patient outcomes generally improved after the change including: mortality within 30 days (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8); ICU admission (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9); length of stay (difference -2.3 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.4); and time to clinical stability (difference -2.4 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5). The interrupted time series analysis suggested improvements in patient outcomes may have occurred regardless of the guideline change.
conclusionsOutcomes for patients with LD were not worsened by the change in antimicrobial guidelines and may have improved. Overall rates of mortality were low. This result was reassuring given the harm that may result from unnecessary use of IV compared with oral antimicrobial agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.