ArticleCancer medicine2025
Quantifying the Diagnosis and Survival of Early Onset Bowel Cancer Among First Nations Peoples in Queensland, Australia.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What Is the Evidence Base Regarding Early Onset Colorectal Cancer in Australia and New Zealand? A Scoping Review.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe incidence of early-onset bowel cancer (EOBC) is increasing in Australia and globally. However, the burden of EOBC among First Nations Australians is rarely determined. This study aimed to quantify the diagnosis and survival rates of EOBC among First Nations Peoples in Queensland, Australia.
methodsCancerCostMod, a linked administrative dataset of patients diagnosed with cancer in Queensland from 1st July 2011 to 30th June 2015, was used. EOBC was defined as a diagnosis of bowel cancer (i.e., colon, rectosigmoid, or rectal cancer) at 18-49 years of age. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the association of Indigenous status and other factors with a diagnosis of EOBC. Five-year survival rates were used to estimate the survival rate.
resultsOf 11,702 bowel cancer cases, 9.2% (95% CI: 8.7%-9.7%) were EOBC, with 19% among First Nations peoples and 9% among Non-First Nations. First Nations Australians had 2.6 times the odds of EOBC diagnosis (95% CI: 1.7-4.0) compared with Non-First Nations Australians. Overall, EOBC patients showed a significantly higher 5-year survival rate of 77% compared with 60% for late-onset bowel cancer patients. However, First Nations EOBC patients showed a lower 5-year survival rate (73%) than Non-First Nations EOBC patients (77%).
conclusionFirst Nations Australians have more than double the diagnosis rates and lower 5-year survival for EOBC compared to Non-First Nations. Whilst the recent lowering of the age eligibility for the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program is a beneficial strategy to address the increasing incidence of EOBC, special consideration should be given to addressing the higher diagnosis rates and lower survival among First Nations Australians. This study raises the potential for further lowering the age eligibility for First Nations Australians to ensure younger First Nations Australians can access screening for earlier detection, thereby improving their survival from bowel cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.