Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40116350›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay Is a Highly Prognostic Biomarker in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Cynthia X Ma, Katherine Weilbaecher, Rama Suresh, Lindsay L Peterson, Ron Bose, Nusayba Bagegni, Caron E Rigden, Ashley Frith, Katherine Clifton and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02124902 (A Co-clinical Trial in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Genoproteomic Discovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02124902 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Co-clinical Trial in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Genoproteomic Discovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2014 to 2021Enrolled148ConditionsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsArmsDocetaxel, Carboplatin, FDG-PET/MR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Foluso O AdemuyiwaDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-2258
Cynthia X MaDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-8156-7492
Katherine WeilbaecherDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-7137-4742
Rama SureshDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-1637-9994
Lindsay L PetersonDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-7347
Ron BoseDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-8894
Nusayba BagegniDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-9322-2451
Caron E RigdenDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-1344
Ashley FrithDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-4122
Katherine CliftonDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-8623-995X
Derek DustinGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-0282
Mingyang CaiGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8063-1002
Liyang XiongGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3257-7643
Sai ChenGuardant Health, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3106-5643
Andrew A DavisDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-2133

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Paul Calabresi K12 Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA167540 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI John F. Dipersio, Ramaswamy Govindan · 2012 to 2026
$11.7M
John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (John T. Milliken Department of Medicine)National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS K12 CA167540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical tools to monitor treatment response and metastatic risk could improve early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care. Although molecular residual disease assays show promise, their use in the neoadjuvant setting requires rapid turnaround times. Tissue-informed approaches may be challenging for patients with limited biopsy samples. The objectives were to determine the surveillance sensitivity for detecting metastatic recurrence and evaluate the ctDNA response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) using a tissue-free epigenomic assay. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients with stage II or III TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy on a clinical trial (NCT02124902) followed by surgery with or without adjuvant therapy were included in this study. Blood samples were prospectively collected before, during, and after completion of NAT and after surgery at prespecified surveillance time points. Plasma samples were analyzed by Guardant Reveal.

resultsA total of 119 patients with TNBC were included in the analysis. ctDNA was detected in the postsurgical setting in 8.9% (7/79) of patients, with an 83% (5/6) patient-level surveillance sensitivity for metastatic recurrence and 99.5% (197/198) sample-level specificity. Postsurgical ctDNA detection was prognostic for the shorter recurrence-free interval (HR, 37.7; P < 0.0001). ctDNA detection at the post-NAT presurgical time point was also associated with a shorter recurrence-free interval in patients with residual disease at surgery (HR, 28.2; P < 0.0001).

conclusionsIn patients with early-stage TNBC, a tissue-free, epigenomic assay demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for metastatic recurrence. ctDNA detection in the neoadjuvant setting indicated poor prognosis, highlighting its potential role across breast cancer care.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAEpigenomicsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID40116350
PMCPMC12133403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.