ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2025
Challenges in Implementing Endoscopic Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Real-World Imaging Conditions on Barrett's Neoplasia Detection.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of real-time artificial intelligence integration on detection of gastric lesions: an exploratory single-center before-and-after study using low-definition routine endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Bridging innovation and clinical reality: Interpreting the comparative study of deep learning models for multi-class upper gastrointestinal disease segmentation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of an improved computer-aided detection system for Barrett's neoplasia in real-world imaging conditions.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in the detection and characterization of gastrointestinal premalignant and early malignant lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in advanced endoscopic imaging: transforming optical diagnosis in gastroenterology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic deep learning systems are often developed using high-quality imagery obtained from expert centers. Therefore, they may underperform in community hospitals where image quality is more heterogeneous.
objectiveThis study aimed to quantify the performance degradation of a computer aided detection system for Barrett's neoplasia, trained on expert images, when exposed to more heterogeneous imaging conditions representative of daily clinical practice. Further, we evaluated strategies to mitigate this performance loss.
methodsWe developed a computer aided detection system using 1011 high-quality, expert-acquired images from 373 Barrett's patients. We assessed its performance on high, moderate and low image quality test sets, each containing images from an independent group of 117 Barrett's patients. These test sets reflected the varied image quality of routine patient care and contained artefacts such as insufficient mucosal cleaning and inadequate esophageal expansion. We then applied three methods to improve the algorithm's robustness to data heterogeneity: inclusion of more diverse training data, domain-specific pretraining and architectural optimization.
resultsThe computer aided detection system, when trained exclusively on high-quality data, achieved area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity scores of 83%, 85% and 67% on the high quality test set. AUC and sensitivity were significantly lower with 80% (p < 0.001) and 62% (p = 0.002) on the moderate-quality and 71% (p > 0.001) and 47% (p = 0.002) on the low-quality test set. Incorporating robustness-enhancing strategies significantly improved the AUC, sensitivity and specificity to 92% (p = 0.004), 88% (p = 0.84) and 81% (p = 0.003) on the high-quality test set, 93% (p = 0.006), 86% (p = 0.01) and 83% (p = 0.09) on the moderate-quality test set and 84% (p = 0.001), 78% (p = 0.002) and 77% (p = 0.23) on the low-quality test set.
conclusionEndoscopic deep learning systems trained solely on high-quality images may not perform well when exposed to heterogeneous imagery, as found in routine practice. Robustness-enhancing training strategies can increase the likelihood of successful clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.