ArticleBiometrics2025
A mixed-effects Bayesian regression model for multivariate group testing data.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratories use group (pooled) testing with multiplex assays to reduce the time and cost associated with screening large populations for infectious diseases. Multiplex assays test for multiple diseases simultaneously, and combining their use with group testing can lead to highly efficient screening protocols. However, these benefits come at the expense of a more complex data structure which can hinder surveillance efforts. To overcome this challenge, we develop a general Bayesian framework to estimate a mixed multivariate probit model with data arising from any group testing protocol that uses multiplex assays. In the formulation of this model, we account for the correlation between true disease statuses and heterogeneity across population subgroups, and we provide for automated variable selection through the adoption of spike and slab priors. To perform model fitting, we develop an attractive posterior sampling algorithm which is straightforward to implement. We illustrate our methodology through numerical studies and analyze chlamydia and gonorrhea group testing data collected by the State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.