ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
Comparison of enriched charge variants from different anti-CD3 bispecific antibodies reveals differential susceptibility of each bispecific arm to post-translational modification.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of enriched charge variants from different anti-CD3 bispecific antibodies reveals differential susceptibility of each bispecific arm to post-translational modification.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Charge heterogeneity is an important quality attribute of therapeutic antibodies, and a detailed understanding of charge heterogeneity arising from post-translational modifications (PTMs) is required by regulatory agencies during drug development. Among antibody therapeutics, the bispecific antibody with two distinct Fab domains targeting distinct antigens provides additional complexity to the charge profile. In this study, charge variant species were enriched from three bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) each containing one anti-CD3 binding arm designed with differential affinity to CD3. The charge heterogeneity corresponding to each anti-CD3 arm within each enriched fraction was evaluated using a domain-specific, digestion-assisted imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) method known as DiCE. Through fractionation, we observed that the anti-CD3 arm of each bispecific antibody exhibited different distributions of acidic variants, even when the anti-CD3 arms were identical based on primary sequence. Reduced peptide mapping was performed on specific fractions to identify unique site-specific PTMs that were uncovered or enriched through fractionation. In each case, the bispecific arm that was most susceptible to PTMs exhibited a more basic isoelectric point. Conformational stability analysis of each bispecific antibody using differential scanning calorimetry suggested that the more basic Fab arm tended to be correlated with a lower melting temperature, although it is unclear the extent to which PTMs on the basic arm may contribute to reduced conformational stability. Overall, these results provide additional evidence that each of the two arms of a bispecific antibody may exhibit differential susceptibility to post-translational modification and that this susceptibility is likely correlated with subtle differences in overall bispecific antibody structure, which is influenced by electrostatic properties inherent to the primary sequence. Future studies to obtain high-resolution structures of full-length bispecific antibodies by crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy may help to elucidate the driving force for susceptibility to PTMs in bispecific antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.