Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40116129›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025

Environmental Enrichment Increases Brain Volume in Snakes.

Gokulan Nagabaskaran, Vijay Moonilal, Morgan Skinner, Noam Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gokulan NagabaskaranDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7703-6843
Vijay MoonilalDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4219-258X
Morgan SkinnerDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-2939
Noam MillerDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-9919

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-05765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of environmental enrichment have been well documented in mammals and birds, but less work has focused on reptiles. Because snakes are common in captivity, both as pets and in research/commercial facilities, it is critical to explore how they react to standard captive housing. Here, we examined the effects of environmental enrichment on brain development in a popular pet snake species, the western hognose snake (Heterodon nasicus). Hognose snakes (n = 15) were individually housed for one year in either enriched or standard environments before their brains were harvested and imaged using MRI. We found that enriched snakes had significantly larger brain volumes compared to standard snakes, most prominently in posterior brain regions. In addition, we observed sex-specific brain investments: as snakes grew larger, males displayed relatively larger cerebral hemispheres, and females displayed larger posterior brain regions. These results suggest that environmental enrichment is critical to encouraging healthy brain development in snakes and that snake brain plasticity is very similar to that observed in mammals and birds.

Indexed as

BrainEnvironmentSnakesAnimalsFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrgan Size3D Slicerbrainenvironmental enrichmentMRIreptilereptile welfareRStudiosnake

Identifiers

PMID40116129
PMCPMC11926773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.