ArticleInternational health2025
Primary healthcare readiness for nutritionally at-risk infants aged under 6 months: a facility-based survey in Senegal.
Article in International health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A WHO global research priority agenda for wasting and nutritional oedema in infants and children under 5 years.BMJ global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalnutrition in infants aged <6 mo (u6m) is poorly identified and managed in many countries, increasing the risk of poor growth and development. Addressing this gap, 2023 WHO malnutrition guidelines recommend assessment, classification and treatment at primary care level. This study aimed to assess primary healthcare facility readiness for nutritional care in infants u6m.
methodsWe adapted the Harmonized Health Facility Assessment (HHFA), adding items for Management of small and nutritionally At-risk Infants u6m and their Mothers (MAMI) at five care contact points. Our HHFA-MAMI tool captured 342 items using healthcare provider interviews, observations and registers data to calculate mean scores per area and median patient visits.
resultsWe surveyed 15 facilities in Senegal. General readiness scored 69.5%, MAMI availability and readiness 37.7%. Infrastructure (72.0%) and health workforce (60.7%) were available, while equipment (32.5%) and training (22.3%) scored low. Infants were frequently assessed (53.6%), not often classified (15.2%) as at risk, nor adequately treated (38.2%). Comparing contact points, delivery and sick child clinic scored highest in readiness, immunization in utilization.
conclusionsPrimary care readiness gaps exist in classifying and treating at-risk infants u6m, equipment and training. We found opportunities at each of the five contact points to implement WHO-recommended care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.