ArticleFuture cardiology2025
Through the gap: a case series on managing Type B aortic dissection with multiple lumens and tears.
Article in Future cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissections are classified as Stanford Type A and B based on site of intimal dissection. Management of Type B dissections is guided by risk stratification. Complicated and high-risk Type B aortic dissections are managed either using endovascular or open surgical repair. Uncomplicated Type B dissections are managed medically. The role of the patency of the false lumen and the presence of reentry tears in the dissecting membrane are still contested. Here, we describe two cases of descending aortic dissections with varying anatomical features in the setting of cocaine use and uncontrolled hypertension. The first case uniquely had a triple lumen dissection with two true lumens, while the second case had two distal tears. Both patients initially had signs of reduced end organ perfusion that resolved with control of comorbid conditions. After multidisciplinary discussions, the decision was made to continue with anti-impulse treatment. Due to the radiological and biochemical absence of evidence of end organ injury even while visceral organs were supplied by the false lumen, our multidisciplinary team preferred conservative management with anti-impulse therapy. This serves as a demonstration of individualized management of Type B aortic dissection in patients with multiple comorbidities using carefully analyzed radiographic and biochemical evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.