ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2025
Supporting Nurse Leaders to Recognize and Intervene in Team Members' Suicidality.
Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Not Angels but Humans' An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Female Nurses With Lived Experience of Self-Harm and Suicidal Behaviours.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators affecting nurses' ability to assess and prevent suicide in general hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNurses and healthcare support staff have a higher suicide risk than the public. This elevated risk calls for increased efforts to support mental health. Additionally, nursing leaders' education on employee-specific suicide prevention is lacking.
designAn evidence-based project was implemented using the PICO question: Among nurse leaders at an academic healthcare system in California, does the provision of an educational program using role-playing practice and the creation of a suicide prevention toolkit versus no standard education or training improve self-efficacy and knowledge on how to take action with a team member who is suspected of being suicidal or voicing suicidal ideation?
methodsEducation sessions were planned based on the literature, with surveys collected preintervention, immediately posteducation, and 1-month postintervention to assess suicide prevention self-efficacy and knowledge. Knowledge was measured using a researcher-constructed questionnaire validated by six suicide prevention experts. The General Self-Efficacy Scale (range: 10-40) was used.
resultsSixty participants attended one of 11 scheduled remote-learning sessions. Mean self-efficacy significantly improved (pre: 31.3 [n = 46, min: 18, max: 40]; immediate post: 33.49 [n = 37, min: 24, max: 40]; 1-month post: 33.77 [n = 31, min: 28, max: 40]) (X
conclusionProject results demonstrate the need to provide suicide prevention training for leaders. The authors recommend requiring training/return demonstration competency as a component of new leaders' onboarding. This program can easily be modified for nurses from prelicensure through senior leadership. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suicide rates in healthcare members are higher than those of the general population. Suicide prevention programs can help nursing leaders feel better prepared to support and connect at-risk healthcare workers with resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.